• Fiction
  • Games
  • Plays
  • Strange Times
  • Strange Pulp
  • Copywriting
  • Bio/Contact

W.M. Akers

  • Fiction
  • Games
  • Plays
  • Strange Times
  • Strange Pulp
  • Copywriting
  • Bio/Contact

Kate Garfield vanquishes Kevin Russo, as Nathan Brisby watches on. Photo: Joshua Sterns

By The Numbers, Tales Of Love & Lasers = 100% Awesome

Kate Garfield vanquishes Kevin Russo, as Nathan Brisby watches on. Photo: Joshua Sterns

Tales of Love & Lasers opens tonight—dear god, tonight!—and as I explored yesterday, this has left this playwright with little to do. Rather than twiddle my thumbs, I turned my attention to something that has kept playwrights amused since the days of Aristotle: the statistics report offered by Final Draft, which gives all sorts of information about scene counts, word counts, and profanity counts. How can a sabermetrically-inclined playwright make use of this raw data? I ran the numbers and tried to find out.

(Before we get into this silliness, do remember that you can buy your tickets here.)

Tales of Love & Lasers is 5.206% about baseball. 

This, I think, is a safe amount. Although the baseball-chatter in the play is concentrated, heartfelt and important to the plot, there's not so much of it that it might overwhelm the sensibilities of the baseball-adverse. By setting these three short plays in the early '70s—a spaceship-heavy version of the early '70s—I'm able to resist my natural urge to chatter infinitely about the New York Mets. Instead, I rely on memories (not my own) of the New York Giants, achieving something closer to universal interest than any of my Metsian blabberings. So, if we were to break this down further, I'd say this play is probably 1% Mets, 4.206% New York Baseball Giants. This is a playwright demonstrating restraint.

Tales of Love & Lasers is 72.498% science fiction.

This feels like a bit of a cheat, since I've been promoting the play as straight sci-fi comedy. The fact is that, while not every moment in the play is death rays and turbolifts, on balance it is a piece of science-fiction. The remaining bits…well, you'll have to come see and find out what they are. Some are real world-ish, some are more fantasy, and some have the air of a Robert Louis Stevenson acid trip. You know—your standard theatrical experience. If I wanted to improve the play, would I look to increase or decrease the sci-fi percentage (SFP)? Rather than up this base number, I would look to improve the sci-fi density in the 72.498%—adding lightsabers and Klaatus and frivolous Rod Serling-type characters, who wander around the background intoning about the grave doings that have been presented for your approval.

Tales of Love & Lasers features two "bullshits," ten "damns," and fifteen "shits."

Again, a special thanks to Final Draft for providing the endlessly amusing profanity report. Special recognition to Stella Starlight—our oft-mentioned queen of space—who is the only character who gets to say motherfucker. (That's according to the script, anyway. Once they get out on the stage, I can't control them any more.) A slightly less special mention to Wayne, who has the less satisfying distinction of being the only character to say "Crap"—not because he's so special, but because it's simply not a very popular curse word. While shit is the most common Final Draft-approved swear in the play, the 24 variations of the word "Fuck" beat it out. Those 24 words make up just .194% of the play, but I promise they'll be your favorite part.

Tales of Love & Lasers is only 12,370 words long.

Playwrights don't think a lot about word count. We may scramble to get under a certain page count, or snip tiny bits from our stage directions so that the phrase The End doesn't appear, forlorn, on its very own page. But we seldom get so nitpicky as to worry about the raw number of words. This is good, since we don't actually write that many of them. It had been a while since I ran a word count on a play, and I was startled by how short it is. 12,370 words? The New Orleans murder story I wrote for Narratively in March came in around 5,000 words, and took only a couple of weeks (and a month or so of research) to turn out. Writing plays, on the other hand, takes fucking forever. Perhaps if the public libraries were good enough to corral all the information I need for one and put it on microfilm, I'd be able to churn through them faster.

Tales of Love & Lasers is 1.083% sword fights. 

As far as words on paper, the swordplay segments of Tales of Love & Lasers occupy just under a page. In an art form where you only need 12,370 words to make up an evening of theater, some words count more than others. While uhs, ands and mmms can be dispensed with in a moment, those pesky words "They fight" can eat up quite a bit of stage time. When I started working with the good women of Squeaky Bicycle on this production, my only request was that we shell out for a fight choreographer. We got a good one, and it shows. That 1.083% of the play will hopefully stick in your memory more than the stage direction itself sticks on the page.

So, Tales of Love & Lasers is 5.206% baseball, 72.498% sci-fi, .194% fuck, and 1.083% sword fighting. That adds up to a scant 78.981%. What makes up the remaining 21.019%? You'll have to come tonight and see for yourself.

Posted in Theater and tagged with Tales of Love & Lasers, Squeaky Bicycle, R For Roxy, Stella Starlight, Hyperion Calling, Fight choreography, baseball, Mets.

May 6, 2014 by W.M. Akers.
  • May 6, 2014
  • W.M. Akers
  • Tales of Love & Lasers
  • Squeaky Bicycle
  • R For Roxy
  • Stella Starlight
  • Hyperion Calling
  • Fight choreography
  • baseball
  • Mets
  • Theater
  • Post a comment
Comment

Kate Garfield, Nathan Brisby and Kevin Russo show off their blasters. Photo: Joshua Sterns.

You Can Tell It's A Good Play Because It Has Blasters

Kate Garfield, Nathan Brisby and Kevin Russo show off their blasters. Photo: Joshua Sterns.

A playwright gets very used to seeing things happen only in his head. A massive space battle runs through your head for a few nights while you're trying to sleep, and finally you decide to set it to paper. "He explodes and exits," reads one stage direction. "They fight. It's very, very exciting," reads another. In your mind, this is all very clear—a dreamy hybrid between fantastic science fiction and the reality of what it might really look like on the stage. And then, once a group of very kind people spend a couple of months actually putting it on the stage, it doesn't look how you imagined it at all. It's real, now, and that's better than any nonsense you could ever dream up.

We had our dress rehearsal yesterday for Tales of Love & Lasers. Opening night is tomorrow. I'm less nervous about this than I have in the past, and I'm not sure if that's because I'm getting more used to opening nights, or because this has been a nearly painless process. (Of course, like painless dentistry, painless theater is an impossibility.) The production team is extremely talented, and has worked together before. The actors are game, hardworking and fun—which is to say, they are actors. And because we're squatting in another play's space, the set was built when we walked in. (Thankfully, it's just a few abstract metal sheets, and not the set for a revival of Superior Donuts.) And because we've been developing these scripts for the last year, I was called on to do no late-night, post-rehearsal rewriting—a shame, if only because nothing makes me feel more like Moss Hart.

So at dress yesterday, I sat and drank a very large cup of tea. And then I drank another very large cup of tea. And then I snuck out to go to the bathroom. At this point, that's all that's required of me. 

If you haven't bought tickets yet, shame on you. Get them here. We're running from tomorrow until May 21st, at the Drilling Company, a cozy little theater on 78th Street, just east of Broadway. If you come by tomorrow, say hello. Look for the slightly drunk man trying not to laugh at his own jokes. 

Lastly, we had an excellent production photographer, Joshua Sterns, in yesterday. He took several hundred pictures, and I've included my favorites below. All photos are Sterns', and the actors are Kate Garfield, Nathan Brisby, Kevin Russo, Monica Jones and Jeff Johnson. Look on our work, ye mighty, and despair. 

The Cafe of the Forgotten
On The Floor
Yahh!
Monica's Headache
Grumpy Jeff
Cookies
She's Not Dead
Sandcastles

Posted in Theater and tagged with My Plays, Tales of Love & Lasers, Stella Starlight, Hyperion Calling, R For Roxy, Squeaky Bicycle.

May 5, 2014 by W.M. Akers.
  • May 5, 2014
  • W.M. Akers
  • My Plays
  • Tales of Love & Lasers
  • Stella Starlight
  • Hyperion Calling
  • R For Roxy
  • Squeaky Bicycle
  • Theater
  • Post a comment
Comment
Kate Garfield and Nathan Martin cower, in "Stella Starlight: Queen of Space." Photo: Bethany Johnsrud

Kate Garfield and Nathan Martin cower, in "Stella Starlight: Queen of Space." Photo: Bethany Johnsrud

WARNING! This Play May Contain Nuts

Kate Garfield and Nathan Martin cower, in "Stella Starlight: Queen of Space." Photo: Bethany Johnsrud

Kate Garfield and Nathan Martin cower, in "Stella Starlight: Queen of Space." Photo: Bethany Johnsrud

We are just a few days away from opening night of Tales of Love & Lasers, and something has become disturbingly clear: this is a silly play. What's more, it is all my fault. Where a normal playwright would be kind enough to restrict his actors to sitting, crossing slowly, and speaking quietly, I have forced five good souls to make fools of themselves. I've got them jumping around, making silly noises, even cursing—and all so a few dozen anonymous audience members can enjoy themselves.

It's sick.

In case you're one of those parasites who's planning on coming out next week—and if you are, you should really go ahead and get your tickets here, you twisted monster—I think it's fair to warn you of a few things. Although it only runs about 80 minutes, Tales of Love & Lasers may contain the following:

  • Power tools covered in colorful duct tape
  • Voices, each sillier than the last
  • Spells performed badly
  • The entirely accurate but potentially hurtful phrase, "A lot of shit happened in Boston"
  • Three or more spurts of dancing
  • Debates about the intergalactic importance of Willie Mays
  • Cardboard used fancifully
  • Jars
  • Three references to buckets
  • A cadre of swamp monsters
  • Ships of sail engulfed in flame
  • A menacing black hole
  • Hesitant references to vending machines
  • Tubes of cake, consumed with abandon
  • Baseball cards that are not as old as they look
  • Cannons

If I cared about my actors, I would have kept them safe in the living room of a tumbledown family mansion, where they could silently fume about unspeakable secrets that threaten to drag them all back into the past. I would have kept conflict buried in subtext. I would have restricted any excitement to an area just off-stage, allowing my protagonist to lean wearily against a window frame, intoning stately dialogue like, "Ma, ma. Look out the window. Once again, the universe has exploded."

Instead, we've let the universe explode on stage. Everyone's going to get hurt, and I hope you're there to see it.

Posted in Theater and tagged with Stella Starlight, R For Roxy, Tales of Love & Lasers, My plays, Squeaky Bicycle.

May 2, 2014 by W.M. Akers.
  • May 2, 2014
  • W.M. Akers
  • Stella Starlight
  • R For Roxy
  • Tales of Love & Lasers
  • My plays
  • Squeaky Bicycle
  • Theater
  • Post a comment
Comment

W.M. Akers

  • Fiction
  • Games
  • Plays
  • Strange Times
  • Strange Pulp
  • Copywriting
  • Bio/Contact
 

Front page art courtesy Brendan Leach.